20 Essex Street Bulletin: Protection of the environment in investment arbitration – a double edged sword
This is an archived article, and some links may not work. Contact us if you have any questions.
Dr Kate Parlett of 20 Essex Street and Sara Ewad co-authored this article discussing the rise in investment disputes with an environmental component. Key points the authors discuss include:
- More than 60 investment disputes filed since 2012 have involved some kind of environmental issue.
- Environmental obligations might be invoked by States against investors, by way of a counterclaim. The most likely basis of a counterclaim is the host State’s domestic law, binding on investors under a contract or other requirement to comply with national laws. A damages award against investors for breach of environmental obligations could be substantial.
- A State’s domestic and international environmental obligations might also be invoked by an investor – an investor might be able to claim damages for the State’s failure to comply with an environmental obligation where such failure has caused damage to a protected investment. An investor might also claim that a State’s environmental obligations should be taken into account in assessing whether there has been a breach of a treaty standard, such as fair and equitable treatment or full protection and security.
The full article is attached below.