The Independent Human Rights Act Review (IHRAR), chaired by Sir Peter Gross, has delivered its report, laid in Parliament yesterday. The press release distributed by the IHRAR is below.
The Human Rights Act – a coherent package of reform to improve its working
Press release: 14 December 2021
The Independent Human Rights Act Review (IHRAR) has reported and today, the Deputy Prime Minister, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, the Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP, laid the Panel’s report in parliament.
Sir Peter Gross, Chairman of the Review Panel said:
“This report recommends a coherent package of reforms to the Human Rights Act, putting our common law and case law centre stage. I urge the Government to implement them in full.”
“The reforms are designed to improve how the HRA operates, both domestically across the UK, and, in the UK Courts’ relationship with the European Court of Human Rights. Otherwise, it is our view that the Human Rights Act works well and has benefited many.”
You can find the executive summary here:
You can find the full report here:
Summary of the key points:
The European Convention on Human Rights (The Convention)
The UK’s contribution to human rights law is immense. It is founded in the common law tradition, dating back centuries. Part of that contribution was the instrumental role the UK took in the drafting and promoting the Convention, to which the UK acceded in 1951.
The Convention came into being in the wake of the Second World War, to avoid further human rights abuses in Europe. It is entirely separate from and has nothing to do with the European Union, which the UK joined subsequently in 1972. The UK remains and intends to remain a party to the Convention, even though it has left the EU.
The Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998
The HRA was passed by Parliament in 1998. It was, primarily, intended to enable individuals to protect their Convention (human) rights in UK Courts, while enabling UK courts to make a distinctive British contribution to the development of human rights law in the Strasbourg Court. The HRA ensures, however, that Parliament remains supreme.
We have seen, from the tremendous response to the IHRAR, just how important the HRA is to so many people from so many walks of life. It has had a significant beneficial impact across society. It is right, however, that after twenty years, how it operates should be reviewed.
The Independent Human Rights Act Review
In 2020, the Government set up IHRAR, chaired by a former Court of Appeal Judge, Sir Peter Gross, with an independent Panel, to conduct an independent and thorough review of the workings of the HRA. Its terms of reference were carefully limited to the workings of the HRA – not the substantive rights in the Convention.
IHRAR took an evidence-based approach and considered the HRA without preconceptions. It consulted widely and received over 150 submissions from the widest spectrum of views. It also undertook fourteen roundtables and seven roadshows, together with meetings with the Strasbourg Court, the Irish Supreme Court and the German Constitutional Court.
IHRAR has worked transparently throughout; the submissions and minutes or recordings of the roundtables and roadshows are on its webpage:
Where IHRAR’s report reflects a majority view, rather than unanimity, this is made clear in the report’s Executive Summary and the report itself.
IHRAR’s proposed reforms
IHRAR recommends a coherent package of reforms intended to improve the way the HRA operates, in essence, as follows:
Contact: Anne Power at email@example.com for any questions you may have.