Matthew enjoys a broad commercial practice. Clients instruct him to advise or act in national and international litigation and arbitrations across Chambers’ practice areas.
Matthew was ranked as a Band 4 Junior for Shipping & Commodities by Chambers & Partners for 2023 named as a Rising Star in Shipping by The Legal 500 2021 and 2022. He also has a particular interest in cybersecurity matters and is the author of ‘A Practical Guide to Cyber Fraud Litigation’. His recent cases have focused on shipping and commodities, company and insolvency, civil fraud, and banking disputes.
As well as acting as sole counsel, Matthew has extensive experience of being instructed as part of a team in large and complex commercial disputes. He appreciates and enjoys the different demands of these cases and the need to work efficiently and effectively with legal and other professionals.
Matthew is frequently instructed to obtain or resist emergency relief, often at short notice, in order to protect his clients’ positions. This has included applications for freezing orders, disclosure orders, interim receiverships, interim declarations and other bespoke injunctions, including against persons unknown.
Matthew also accepts instructions to act on a direct access basis or to provide advice in non-contentious situations. He has previously given expert evidence on English law for use in foreign proceedings and has also provided opinions by way of early neutral evaluation.
Privacy notice
Example cases
- CH Offshore v Internaves Consorcio Naviero and others [2021] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 465: Instructed by the arbitration claimants in an appeal from an arbitration award, wherein the claimant brokers & consultant were successful in their US$10 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration claim for commission & consultancy fees in respect of certain long-term charters (led by Christopher Hancock QC).
- CMOC v Persons Unknown and others [2019] Lloyd’s Rep FC 62: US$8 million claim in the Commercial Court to trace and recover funds that were stolen in a ‘business email compromise’ fraud, involving the first-known occasion that a worldwide freezing injunction has been granted against ‘persons unknown’ (led by Paul Lowenstein QC).
- Sino Channel v Dana Shipping [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 17 (CA): Court of Appeal case concerning the validity of an arbitration that had been commenced by serving notices on an apparent agent of the contract of affreightment counterparty (led by Duncan Matthews QC).
- Banque Internationale de Commerce v Alaghband and others (claim no: CL-2019-000090): US$3.7 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the bank brought a number of claims arising out of an apparent fraud perpetrated against it by its former customer, now in liquidation and the subject of a Serious Fraud Office investigation.
- Libyan Investment Authority v Credit Suisse and others [2021] EWHC 2684 (Comm): US$200 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the sovereign wealth fund seeks rescission of certain derivative options on the grounds of fraud, illegality, breach of fiduciary duty and undue influence on the part of the international investment bank (led by Roger Masefield QC of Brick Court Chambers).
- PJSC National Bank Trust and another v Boris Mints and others (claim nos: CL-2019-000412 & CL-2020-000432): US$708 million claim in the Commercial Court in which two banks bring Russian law claims in respect of an alleged fraud perpetrated by various individuals, who are alleged to have procured the replacement of valuable loans with valueless bonds (led by Duncan Matthews QC).
- Previously instructed in a US$42 million International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration between shareholders in relation to the delayed construction of a shipping port (previously led by Philip Edey QC).
Arbitration
- Sino Channel v Dana Shipping [2018] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 17: Court of Appeal case concerning the validity of an arbitration that had been commenced by serving notices on an apparent agent of the contract of affreightment counterparty (led by Duncan Matthews QC).
- Previously acted as tribunal secretary (to Julian Lew QC) in a US$6 million ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning the construction of a joint venture and financing agreement in relation to oil and gas exploration.
- Author of the ‘Arbitration Law’ chapter in Lloyd’s International Maritime and Commercial Law Yearbook since 2019.
Banking and financial services
- Libyan Investment Authority v Credit Suisse and others [2021] EWHC 2684 (Comm): US$200 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the sovereign wealth fund seeks rescission of certain derivative options on the grounds of fraud, illegality, breach of fiduciary duty and undue influence on the part of the international investment bank (led by Roger Masefield QC of Brick Court Chambers).
- I.F.T. S.A.L. Offshore v Barclays Bank Plc [2020] EWHC 3125 (Comm): A victim of cyber fraud obtained permission to use disclosure obtained from a bank to pursue a claim against the bank directly, alleging that the bank is liable for a US$250,000 fraud perpetrated by the bank’s customer because the bank received and paid out the proceeds of the fraud.
- PJSC National Bank Trust and another v Boris Mints and others (claim nos: CL-2019-000412 & CL-2020-000432): US$708 million claim in the Commercial Court in which two banks bring Russian law claims in respect of an alleged fraud perpetrated by various individuals, who are alleged to have procured the replacement of valuable loans with valueless bonds (led by Duncan Matthews QC).
- Banque Internationale de Commerce v Alaghband and others (claim no: CL-2019-000090): US$3.7 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the bank brought a number of claims arising out of an apparent fraud perpetrated against it by its former customer, now in liquidation and the subject of a Serious Fraud Office investigation.
- Al Farouqi v Ikon Finance Limited & Hantec Markets Limited (claim no: QB-2019-003189): US$53 million claim in the Queen’s Bench Division in which a former client of two FCA-regulated entities brings a number of claims in contract, tort and equity arising out of an alleged fraud perpetrated by the entities on the client.
- Previously instructed by a leading international bank in relation to the FCA review of the misselling of interest rate hedging products (IRHPs).
Civil fraud and asset tracing
- CMOC v Persons Unknown and others [2019] Lloyd’s Rep FC 62: US$8 million claim in the Commercial Court to trace and recover funds that were stolen in a ‘business email compromise’ fraud, involving the first-known occasion that a worldwide freezing injunction has been granted against ‘persons unknown’ (led by Paul Lowenstein QC).
- I.F.T. S.A.L. Offshore v Barclays Bank Plc [2020] EWHC 3125 (Comm): A victim of cyber fraud obtained permission to use disclosure obtained from the bank to pursue a claim against a bank directly, alleging that the bank is liable for the US$250,000 fraud as having received and subsequently paid out the proceeds of the fraud.
- Banque Internationale de Commerce v Alaghband and others (claim no: CL-2019-000090): US$3.7 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the bank brought a number of claims arising out of an apparent fraud perpetrated against it by its former customer, now in liquidation and the subject of a Serious Fraud Office investigation.
- PJSC National Bank Trust and another v Boris Mints and others (claim nos: CL-2019-000412 & CL-2020-000432): US$708 million claim in the Commercial Court in which two banks bring Russian law claims in respect of an alleged fraud perpetrated by various individuals, who are alleged to have procured the replacement of valuable loans with valueless bonds (led by Duncan Matthews QC).
- Libyan Investment Authority v Credit Suisse and others [2021] EWHC 2684 (Comm): US$200 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the sovereign wealth fund seeks rescission of certain derivative options on the grounds of fraud, illegality, breach of fiduciary duty and undue influence on the part of the international investment bank (led by Roger Masefield QC of Brick Court Chambers).
- Re Michael John Stanley, Re Layezy Limited and others (claim nos: BR-2019-000453, CR-2019-001703, CR-2019-001704, CR-2019-001706 & CR-2019-001795): Acting for the trustees-in-bankruptcy and liquidators in the insolvency of an individual and certain associated companies following the collapse of a £53million betting syndicate which operated as a Ponzi scheme.
Commodities and international trade
- Banque Internationale de Commerce v Alaghband and others (claim no: CL-2019-000090): US$3.7 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the bank claimed in respect of an apparent commodities trading fraud perpetrated against it by its former customer.
- Instructed in a US$3.1 million Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA) arbitration concerning non-delivery of cargo due to restrictions in Ukraine and allegations of wrongful dealing with other parties in a chain of sale contracts.
- Previously instructed in a US$1.7 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration concerning the misdelivery into storage then to purported receivers of a cargo (led by David Lewis QC).
- Previously instructed in a US$3.2 million International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration regarding off-specification acetone that was said to have deteriorated in storage.
Company law
- Health & Home Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Elite Property Holdings Limited and others (claim no: BL-2021-001722): Acting for a company in liquidation and its liquidators in a claim against former directors, shareholders and associated companies to recover over £2 million alleged to be due in debt, by reason of unlawful dividends, and as compensation for company assets sold at an undervalue prior to a creditor’ voluntary liquidation.
- Re DeceasedUmbrella.com Limited (claim nos: CR-2021-000623 & CR-2017-006482): Acting for the liquidators in a claim against a former director, seeking an account of certain dealings which are alleged to constitute wrongful dissipation of over £1million of company assets to preferred third parties in the face of the company’s impending insolvency.
- Aliyev v. Partner Capital and others (claim no. QB-2018-000502): £200,000 claim for damages where an investor alleged breach of contractual and fiduciary duties said to have been owed to him by two companies and various directors of the second company, where the investor engaged the services of the first company to advise the investor in acquiring a shareholding in the second company.
- Previously instructed in a US$2 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration between shareholders in a joint venture company, where one shareholder is alleging breach of contract, breach of director’s duties and fraud as against the other shareholder.
Energy and infrastructure
- Previously instructed in a US$42 million International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) arbitration between shareholders in relation to the delayed construction of a shipping port (previously led by Philip Edey QC).
- Previously acted as tribunal secretary (to Julian Lew QC) in a US$6 million ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning the construction of a joint venture and financing agreement in relation to oil and gas exploration.
Insolvency and restructuring
- Health & Home Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Elite Property Holdings Limited and others (claim no: BL-2021-001722): Acting for a company in liquidation and its liquidators in a claim against former directors, shareholders and associated companies to recover over £2 million alleged to be due in debt, by reason of unlawful dividends, and as compensation for company assets sold at an undervalue prior to a creditor’s voluntary liquidation.
- Re Robson Asset Management ManCo [2020] EWHC 2880 (Ch): Acted for the petitioner in a contested winding up petition, where the operator of a major London hotel sought the liquidation of its former management company in respect of a £1million debt.
- Re Michael John Stanley, Re Layezy Limited and others (claim nos: BR-2019-000453, CR-2019-001703, CR-2019-001704, CR-2019-001706 & CR-2019-001795): Acting for the trustees-in-bankruptcy and liquidators in the insolvency of an individual and certain associated companies following the collapse of a £53million betting syndicate which operated as a Ponzi scheme.
- Re Charter Projects (Developments) Limited (claim no: CR-2019-008202): Acted for the successful former administrators of a company in a series of applications by both the director and the former administrators respectively to challenge and fix the basis of the former administrators’ remuneration.
- Re DeceasedUmbrella.com Limited (claim nos: CR-2021-000623 & CR-2017-006482): Acted for the successful liquidators in a claim against a former director, seeking an account of certain dealings which were held to constitute wrongful dissipation of over £1million of company assets to preferred third parties in the face of the company’s impending insolvency.
- Previously instructed for the petitioning creditors seeking the liquidation of a Cayman Islands entity in respect of certain sums due under arbitration awards (led by Stephen Atherton QC).
Jurisdiction, conflicts and enforcement
- Denisov v Delvecchio and others [2022] EWHC 377 (Comm): Oral application for permission to serve a civil fraud claim out of the jurisdiction where a foreign domiciled claimant brought proceedings against foreign domiciled defendants in respect of an alleged fraud perpetrated on the claimant in the course of the purchase of real property abroad.
- Banque Internationale de Commerce v Alaghband and others (claim no: CL-2019-000090): Contested application to enforce a Tomlin order in respect of a US$3.7 million claim in the Commercial Court in which the bank claims in respect of an apparent commodities trading fraud perpetrated against it by its former customer.
- Empeirikos v Xanthouli (claim no. QB-2019-004578): €3 million claim in the Queen’s Bench Division for an enforcement at common law of a Greek judgment which was under appeal.
- Unwired Planet v Huawei [2017] EWHC 2831 (Pat): Claim in Chancery Division concerning certain mobile communication patents, subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court. Previously instructed to obtain an anti-suit injunction to restrain litigation in the courts of the People’s Republic of China (led by Thomas Raphael QC).
- Previously instructed in a €24 million London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) arbitration concerning a shipbuilding contract where the yard had entered a foreign insolvency process, raising cross-border insolvency issues.
Shipping
- CM P-Max III v Petroleos del Norte (The Stena Primorsk) [2022] EWHC 2147 (Comm): US$200,000 claim in the Commercial Court for demurrage, defended on the basis that the vessel allegedly failed to comply with Charterers’ order by leaving berth for safety reasons.
- CH Offshore v Internaves Consorcio Naviero and others [2021] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 465: Instructed by the arbitration claimants in an appeal from an arbitration award, wherein the claimant brokers were successful in their US$10 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration claim for commission in respect of certain long-term charters (led by Christopher Hancock QC).
- Previously instructed in a US$200 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration concerning default under four bareboat-hire-purchase agreements (led by Nevil Philips of Quadrant Chambers).
- Previously instructed in a US$3.5 million London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration concerning the consequences on a time charter of an unexpected seizure of the vessel by a national authority whilst the vessel was at anchor in a common waiting area (led by Henry Byam-Cook KC).
- Previously instructed in a US$2 million ad hoc arbitration concerning the termination of a liner agency agreement and whether the liner agent was in breach of fiduciary duties owed to the shipping line.
- Previously instructed in a €24 million London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) arbitration concerning a shipbuilding contract where the yard had entered a foreign insolvency process.
Technology, media and telecoms
- TIBCO Software (Ireland) v Tesco Stores (claim no. HT-2022-000135): £86 million claim in the Technology & Construction Court in respect of alleged under-licensing by Tesco of TIBCO software products (led by Lawrence Akka KC).
- NR v Bitstamp Limited (claim no. CL-2021-000329): Anonymised claim in the Commercial Court to obtain disclosure in England from a cryptocurrency exchange to assist in proceedings abroad against those responsible for the multi-million pound theft and laundering of cryptocurrency.
- I.F.T. S.A.L. Offshore v Barclays Bank Plc [2020] EWHC 3125 (Comm): A victim of cyber fraud obtained permission to use disclosure obtained from a bank to pursue a claim against the bank directly, alleging that the bank is liable for the US$250,000 fraud as having received and subsequently paid out the proceeds of the fraud.
- CMOC v Persons Unknown and others[2019] Lloyd’s Rep FC 62: US$8 million claim in the Commercial Court to trace and recover funds that were stolen in a ‘business email compromise’ fraud, involving the first-known occasion that a worldwide freezing injunction has been granted against ‘persons unknown’ (led by Paul Lowenstein QC).
- Hussain v Rezaie & Malhotra (claim no. H0QZ49M6): Acted pro bono for an individual alleging that the Defendants had defrauded him by persuading him to invest in an Initial Coin Offering of a new cryptocurrency, which is now alleged to have been a pyramid scheme.
- Previously instructed in a US$200,000 London Maritime Arbitrator’s Association (LMAA) arbitration between counterparties where a fraudster had perpetrated a cyber attack so as to procure the paying party under the contract to pay the fraudster instead of the payee party.