Find a Barrister

Find an Arbitrator

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
people

Contact

Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).

Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.

For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our Head of Business Development for Asia Pacific, Katie-Beth Jones, and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our practice management team in London.

London

20 Essex Street
London
WC2R 3AL

enquiries@twentyessex.com
t: +44 20 7842 1200

Singapore

28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120

singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230

Contact

Contact with chambers should be made through the Practice Management Team. They are happy to discuss client requirements and provide further information on such matters as the expertise and experience of individual members, fees, working practices and languages spoken. We have members able to work in French, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Greek and Chinese (Mandarin).

Outside working hours, a member of our team is always available to be contacted on matters of an urgent nature. Contact should be made using the Chambers main number or email.

For our Singapore office, for client enquiries please contact our Head of Business Development for Asia Pacific, Katie-Beth Jones, and for all other queries please contact Lynn Quek. Out of office hours calls will automatically be diverted to our practice management team in London.

London

20 Essex Street
London
WC2R 3AL

enquiries@twentyessex.com
t: +44 20 7842 1200

Singapore

28 Maxwell Road
#02-03 Maxwell Chambers Suites
Singapore 069120

singapore@twentyessex.com
t: +65 62257230

23/02/2024

When preliminary turns prejudicial: new judgment on arbitrator bias

H1 & H2 v W & Ors is a rare example of the court removing an arbitrator for apparent bias under s 24(1) Arbitration Act 1996. The case arose out of a claim on film production insurance following an on-set accident with a Molotov cocktail which led to the lead actor being badly burned. The arbitration agreement in the insurance policy provided for an ‘experienced practitioner in film or television production’ and a sole arbitrator was duly appointed by the British Film Institute.

Calver J held that a fair-minded observer would consider there was a real possibility of bias, by reason of comments made at a PTR in the arbitration by the novice, non-lawyer arbitrator. The comments related to the evidence of an expert already known to the arbitrator.

While each case of apparent bias will turn on its facts, the judgment contains interesting analysis of what is to be expected of trade or industry arbitrators, and of the extent to which decision-makers can safely make provisional comments on the merits without a risk of demonstrating apparent bias.

The court also addressed the principles relating to anonymisation that are relevant to such an application.

David Lewis KC appeared for the insured, instructed by Quinn Emanuel.

Relevant members
David Lewis KC
Share